References

    • An, T., & Oliver, M. (2021). What in the world is educational technology? rethinking the field from the perspective of the philosophy of technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1810066
    • Anderson, C. (2008). Teaching in an online learning context. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and Practice of online learning. Athabasca, AB, Canada: Athabasca University
    • Anstey. L. & Watson, G. (2018).A Rubric for Evaluating E-Learning Tools in Higher Education. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/9/a-rubric-for-evaluating-e-learning-tools-in-higher-education
    • Aşıksoy, G. (2018). The effects of the gamified flipped classroom environment (GFCE) on students’ motivation, learning achievements and perception in a physics course. Quality &Quantity, 52(S1), 129-145. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0597-1
    • Association of American Colleges & Universities (n.d). Integrative and applied learning value rubric. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/integrative-learning
    • Atwood, M. (2011). In other worlds: SF and the human imagination (1st U.S. ed.). Nan A. Talese/Doubleday.
    • Bates, T. (2014). Choosing and using media in education: The SECTIONS model. In Teaching in digital age. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/part/9-pedagogical-differences-between-media/
    • BC Ministry of Education (2018). BC’s new curriculum. Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/adst
    • Behnke, K. (2015). Gamification in introductory computer science. University of Colorado Boulder. Retrieved from https://www.colorado.edu/atlas/sites/default/files/attached-files/gamificationin-introductory-computer-science.pdf
    • Ben-Ari, M. (1998). Constructivism in computer science education. SIGCSE Bulletin, 30(1), 257-261. https://doi.org/10.1145/274790.274308
    • Benjamin R (2019).Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Beynon, M. (2009). Constructivist computer science education reconstructed. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 8(2), 73-90. doi:10.11120/ital.2009.08020073
    • Boettcher, J. V. & Conrad, R.-M. (2016). The Online Teaching Survival Guide (2nd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    • Bogost, I. (2011). Persuasive Games: Exploitationware. Gamasutra. Retrieved from https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/6366/persuasive_games_exploitationware.php?print=1
    • Brook University (n.d.). Critical reflection rubric. Retrieved from https://brocku.ca/pedagogical-innovation/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/Critical-Reflection-Rubric.pdf
    • Colburn, T. & Shute G. (2010). Knowledge, Truth, and Values in Computer Science. In Vallverdú, J., & InfoSci-Books (Eds). Thinking machines and the philosophy of computer science: Concepts and principles, (pp.119-131). Hershey PA: Information Science Reference.
    • Eglash, R., Gilbert, J. E., & Foster, E. (2013). Broadening participation toward culturally responsive computing education. Communications of the ACM, 56(7), 33-36.
    • Eglash, R., Bennett, A., Babbitt, W., Lachney, M., Reinhardt, M., & Hammond‐Sowah, D. (2020). Decolonizing posthumanism: Indigenous material agency in generative STEM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1334-1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12963
    • Ertmer, P. & Newby, T. (2013). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26 (2) 43-71. DOI 10.1002/piq.21143
    • Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Columbia University: Teachers College Press.
    • Fotaris, P., Mastoras, T., Leinfellner, R., & Rosunally, Y. (2016). Climbing up the leaderboard: An empirical study of applying gamification techniques to a computer programming class. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 14(2), 94-110. Retrieved from www.ejel.org
    • Graham, M., Kitchin, R., Mattern, S., Shaw, J., Romo-Melgar, C., Sage, J. P., Aalbers, M. B., Alizadeh, T., Ash, J., Barns, S., Brown, G., Burns, R., Claudel, M., Crampton, J. W., Datta, A., Dodge, M., Evans, L., Foley, J., Gabrys, J., . . . Miller, H. J. (2019). How to run a city like amazon, and other fables. Meatspace Press.
    • Harrell, D.F. (2010) Toward a theory of critical computing: the case of social identity representation in digital media applications. Code Drift: Essays in Critical Digital Studies. Retrieved from https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14683
    • Hazzan, O., Dubinsky, Y., Eidelman, L., Sakhnini, V., & Teif, M. (2006;2007;). Qualitative research in computer science education. 408-412. https://doi.org/10.1145/1121341.1121469
    • Lachney, M., Bennett, A. G., Eglash, R., Yadav, A., & Moudgalya, S. (2021). Teaching in an open village: A case study on culturally responsive computing in compulsory education. Computer Science Education, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1874228
    • Latour, B. (2005). From realpolitik to dingpolitik. Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy, 1444.
    • Litts, B. K., Searle, K. A., Brayboy, B. M. J., & Kafai, Y. B. (2021). Computing for all?: Examining critical biases in computational tools for learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 842-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13059
    • Long, P. & Siemens, G. Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/9/penetrating-the-fog-analytics-in-learning-and-education
    • Mazur, E. (2013). Assessment: The Silent Killer of Learning / Eric Mazur [Dudley Herschbach Teacher/Scientist Lecture [Video post]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBzn9RAJG6Q
    • McDonald, J., Moskal, A. C. M., Goodchild, A., Stein, S., & Terry, S. (2019). Advancing text-analysis to tap into the student voice: A proof-of-concept study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-11. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1614524
    • Minority Rights Group International. (2020). Minority and Indigenous Trends 2020: Focus on Technology. Retrieved from  https://minorityrights.org/trends2020/
    • Monforte, J. (2018). What is new in new materialism for a newcomer? Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10(3), 378-390. doi:10.1080/2159676x.2018.1428678
    • Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism . New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
    • Nicholson, S. (2015). A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In T. Reiners & L. A.Wood(Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Springer.
    • O’Brien, J. (2020).Digital ethics in higher education. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/5/digital-ethics-in-higher-education-2020
    • Oxford Analytica. (2016). Gamification and the future of education. Retrieved from https://www.oxan.com/insights/client-thought-leadership/archive/gamification-of-education/
    • Philip, K., Irani, L., & Dourish, P. (2012). Postcolonial computing: A tactical survey. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 37(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910389594
    • Pritchard, D., & ProQuest (Firm). (2018). What is this thing called knowledge? (Fourth;1; ed.). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351980326
    • Rapaport, W.(2020). Philosophy of Computer Science. Retrieved from https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/Papers/phics.pdf
    • Santaniello, N. (2017). 6 Ways to Conduct A Comprehensive LMS Evaluation. E-learning Industry. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/lms-evaluation-6-ways-comprehensive
    • Sclater, N., & Bailey, P. (2015). JISC Code of practice for learning analytics. Retrieved  from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/code-of-practice-for-learning-analytics
    • Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x.
    • Selwyn, N. (2012). Ten suggestions for improving academic research in education and technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.680213
    • Selwyn, N., Pangrazio, L., Nemorin, S., & Perrotta, C. (2020). What might the school of 2030 be like? An exercise in social science fiction. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1694944.
    • Suter, W. N., & SAGE Research Methods Core. (2012). Introduction to educational research: A critical thinking approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE
    • Taylor, P. G. (1996). Chapter 3: Pedagogical challenges of open learning: Looking to borderline issues. Counterpoints (New York, N.Y.), 29, 59-77.
    • Tedre, M., Sutinen, E., Kähkönen, E., & Kommers, P. (2006). Ethnocomputing: ICT in cultural and social context. Communications of the ACM, 49(1), 126-130. https://doi.org/10.1145/1107458.1107466
    • Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M. (2020). Post-covid-19 education and education technology ‘Solutionism’: A Seller’s market. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 863-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x
    • Tobin, T. J. (2014). Increase online student retention with universal design for learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 15(3), 13-24.
    • Vandervelde, J. (2018). EPortfolio (Digital Portfolio) Rubric. University of Wisconsin-Stout. Retrieved from https://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/eportfoliorubric.html
    • Von Glasersfeld, E. (2005). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In Fosnot, C. T. (Eds). Constructivism: theory, perspectives, and practice, (2nd ed., pp.20-25). Columbia University: Teachers College Press.
    • All Site images are Pixabay.com [CC0]